deal architect

A perspective on the SAP Capital Markets Day

I am a customer and market analyst and tend to not attend too many earnings calls or Wall Street presentations. But I made time to listen to the SAP presentation yesterday. It was a coming out event for the 2 new co-CEOs, Jen Morgan and Christian Klein and there has been much speculation (with a capital S in my opinion, not fact based) about the activist investor impact on SAP trajectory. The full set of presentations is in the video here - without the breaks its about 3 hours long. The theme was "Growth and Operational Excellence" and I liked quite a bit of what I saw and heard.

To me, growth comes from market differentiation and here are key areas where SAP executives scored well

Momentum in Asia

Both Jen and Adaire Fox-Martin made repeated points about Asia/Pac. SAP is very well positioned in that region as I wrote a couple of months ago "SAP has been in Asia over 30 years and now has over 9,000 employees spread across 31 office in the region. The event in Bangkok showed me just how far the competition has to go to catch up."

Cross-selling

I always shake my head at how little cross-selling has taken place across SAP's product portfolio (listen to Jen starting around 0.16 and Christian around 0.34 about inter-dependence and synergy across SAP products). Most of their competitors can only play in one or two categories.  I am seeing many customers look at application rationalization, and reverse a decade of "ring fencing" their ERP with best of breed cloud applications. As SAP better breaks down its many siloes, starts to show more coherent road maps and delivers better integration, its broad suite should open up many new opportunities within its incumbent customers. 

S/4 adoption

SAP is associated with large, multi-national customers, but the CIO of Chobani, the yogurt company, Parag Agrawal (starting 1:29) was a good representative for the mid-sized, fast growing market that S/4 is doing well in. 40% of S/4 adopters are net new to SAP. The ECC to S/4 conversion market is also gathering steam. As Adaire says, the question for most customers is not 'if" but "when" "why" and "how". As I described in SAP Nation 3.0 - "tilting its bell curve of customers" is its largest single opportunity.

XM and CX

Qualtrics is still a missionary sell to many operationally focused ERP buyers but Ryan Smith humorously reminded the audience that precisely a year ago, he was presenting in a road show which valued the company at nearly $ 5 billion, and that now, as part of SAP, the deal size and customer growth has accelerated. It is another differentiation for SAP. Similarly, SAP has had fits and starts when it comes to the CRM market. But with all the musical chairs in the executive suite at many CRM vendors in the last few weeks you get the sense that market is poised for disruption. SAP's CX portfolio, especially the Commerce piece, and with new leadership under Bob Stutz, will get another shot.    

The Microsoft "embrace"

Microsoft and SAP have been 'frenemies" for decades. At Gartner and since I have written about many joint initiatives like Mondecino and Duet (nearly 15 years ago). The collaboration around Azure opens up support of the vast Microsoft channel, and also simplifies the hyperscaler choice for many undecided customers (while keeping open support for customer loads on AWS, Google and Alibaba clouds). The cloud version of S/4 and SCP should in particular benefit.   

Turning to Operational Excellence, there was quite a bit of focus on margin and cash flow improvement.

Christian has led a digital transformation within SAP for a couple of years and it is accelerating. It's the tagline of "Best Run Business" applied to SAP itself. His points, starting around 0.38, lay out the high level agenda.  Adaire described some of the digital and AI impact on the sales function around 1:26. Thomas Saueressig, starting at 1:09 talks about changes in the development organization. He also addressed the thorny issue of integration, especially across the slew of acquisitions in the last decade,  that customers constantly complain about. In his previous role as global CIO at SAP, he is acutely aware of the pain points (It's also something Bob Stutz in the CX area will have to accelerate). He also touched on centralization of infrastructure. which CFO Luka Mucic quantified (starting at 1:40) as they move from 25 mostly acquired technology stacks to a converged one, and also shifting many cloud loads to the 4 hyperscaler partners.

Luka also touched on improvement of cloud gross margins and marketing and SG&A efficiencies - consolidation of many sponsorships, supplier base among others.

Three areas I would like to understand more:

Margins at the expense of customers?

There is plenty of fat to be removed from within SAP and that should deliver the improved margins SAP is promising to investors. But the temptation in our industry is also to milk the customer (Oracle and the fast growing SaaS vendors are not much better). In the last few years, we have seen quite a backlash to Indirect Access and other SAP audits. I am also seeing SAP propose license conversion fees to move from on-prem to cloud versions. Customers are willing to pay for new functionality, not so much for what they have already paid years in maintenance. So, trying to extract more from older function points, which frankly have been commoditized over the last couple of decades, will only slow down incumbent customer traction.

Focus on total cost to customers?

Historically, SAP has not been very good at benchmarking and managing its partners. That led to my quantifying the huge "GDP" of SAP Nation. As we look at moves from ECC to S/4, I am starting to again see scary SI proposals. Labor intensive and not much automation, with the suspect quality and economics those threaten. Now with the 4 hyperscalers customers could face significant additional exposure. SAP likes to brag it has 000s of partners - without pointing out that cost is borne by customers. I would like to see more SAP detail on how it will better manage its ecosystem, and accelerate its automation and application of ML to its many of the routine conversion, testing, training and other tasks - see more ideas here. Adaire did mention conversion factories - like to hear more about that.

Not enough R&D or Capex to grow the functional footprint?

There was surprisingly little on industry functionality. SAP keeps promising its partners are working on it. For the next few years, it appears there will be little excess R&D or capex for acquisitions. While SAP needs that discipline in the short term, markets don't wait for ever. Beyond verticals, as I wrote earlier this week "the definition of the "enterprise" continues to rapidly expand and morph, and I see a very fragmented market for the next few years". SAP says it has a shot at a TAM of $ 500 billion by 2023. In my opinion, they could already be aiming for a trillion.

Overall, there was much to like in the 3 hours. As an analyst, it is my job to keep pushing vendors to do more for customers, but realize the new executives already have a very full plate to tackle. Should be a very exciting next few years. It is a great way to kick off a new decade!

Gradually, then suddenly

Lots of people are rattled by all the executive changes in the industry over the last few months ...Bill McDermott and Rob Enslin at SAP...John Donahoe at ServiceNow...Mark Hurd and Thomas Kurian at Oracle ...Charles Phillips at Infor....Bob Stutz at Salesforce....

There is plenty of speculation ... Call me old fashioned, but I take the long view and being one degree of separation removed from many of these executives, I prefer to do my usual 360 degree calling around. Besides, as a colleague said "The signals were there if you knew where to look". Hemingway was even more poetic when he wrote “How did you go bankrupt?" Two ways. Gradually, then suddenly.”  

To me, change is healthy. And often builds up over a couple of decades. Unlike many, I am not that agitated by what is happening in Washington or London. I ignore the shenanigans and the political media but I can see why we got to where we did. And look at ways to adapt to the changes.

Same thing with enterprise tech. In my recent book, I cataloged the last twenty years and described how Apple near dead, Google, Amazon, Foxconn and many others, mere babes then have thrived. I looked at how over a million on-prem customers have not budged. How 80% of the geographic and vertical white spaces have not been filled with modern solutions. Systems integrators continue to try and do business the same old, labor intensive ways they did in the last go-around. 

It would be silly to not expect major changes given this build up. The key is not to confuse individual with corporate trajectories. The good news is we are seeing new leaders like Jen Morgan get a chance to put her imprint. With McDermott headed to ServiceNow and Stutz to SAP, we will see plenty of activity in the customer/revenue-centric segment of the market. There will be lots more activities in areas that did not see investment in the last few years.

Here's my advice to customers. Take time to revisit your application portfolio. There are plenty of opportunities to modernize, consolidate, better integrate your applications. Your legacy has security and compliance risks and plenty of recruiting risks as you look to attract younger talent.

To vendors - question what may have worked over the last decade or so. Plenty of new opportunities and threats to focus us.

There will be plenty of distracting noise and speculation as we are seeing in politics.   Ignore all that, disrupt yourself and embrace the change.  Lots coming.

A wide open race in enterprise software

If you are into speeds and feeds, last week in sports was particularly interesting. It marked the 19th anniversary of Dale Earnhardt's improbable win at the Talladega Superspeedway. Seemingly hopeless in 18th place with just 4 laps to go, Earnhardt somehow went on to win that NASCAR race. It was his last major win. Watch the last few laps in the video below.

Earlier in the week, Eliud Kipchoge of Kenya ran 26.2 miles in Vienna is a record-breaking time for a marathon in just under two hours. It was not an official race but it showed the art of the possible when technology (supplied by Nike, INEOS and others) and technique come together as I posted on New Florence. 

As we approach the end of this decade, I have thinking a lot about the race in enterprise software.

In my recent book. I looked at the last 20 years in software. By many metrics, the pace of change has been glacial. Over a million on-prem customers have not migrated core applications to modern cloud or in-memory architectures. On the vendor side there are all kinds of neglected white spaces when you look at industry or country specific coverage.

And yet the vendor landscape has changed considerably. You could argue Apple, Amazon and Google have had more of an influence on enterprise applications than did SAP, Oracle and Microsoft. Salesforce, ServiceNow, Adobe, Workday and others have become major players. Plenty of global and vertical players are nipping at the heels. With customers building more than buying applications players like VMWare have become more influential. Service providers have evolved - many these days are as much contract manufacturers, digital agencies and third party maintenance providers. Telcos are gearing up for a next wave of 5G and satellite services. Customers are themselves becoming tech vendors as they make their own products and services smarter with software and sensor support.

When I talk to CIOs these days, I hear of opportunities and challenges like vendor end-of- life dates, automation, digital transformation, multi-cloud leverage and application portfolio consolidation. They increasingly worry about their recruiting profile as younger tech staff show little interest in supporting their legacy applications.  Vendors are themselves showing signs of big change - there is new management in the last few months at SAP, Infor, Oracle and Unit4.

It should be an exciting next few years. May be the roaring Twenties again? But they also raise some interesting questions: Will we see an Earnhardt break away from an increasingly crowded vendor market? In that race he was described as"...suddenly, seeming out of nowhere, Earnhardt charged forward, parting the field like Moses parting the Red Sea.."

And who like Kipchoge is working on stuff that makes you go wow. 

In my role, I am paid to help clients put bets, so I have my views on the likely Earnhardts and the Kipchoges.  But I would love to hear your perspectives. Comment away!

 

Why the changes at SAP may be timely for the industry

Since Thursday evening I have heard from many if I am surprised by the changes at the top at SAP

My answer is "only slightly"

From Sapphire in May, I wrote after some of the changes earlier in the year

"Nick Tzitzon, EVP of Marketing and Communications had told me "we have individuals in some cases who collectively have worked for SAP for 100 years, and who decided that it was time to try something else in their career. Does this not happen in every company?" Hasso Plattner was even more emphatic when he told a few of us that several customer executives have marveled at the smooth transition. He told us SAP is much "younger" now and he has never been more proud of the company. Watch this keynote and see the energy of execs like Christian Klein, Ryan Smith, Jen Morgan and others."

At the event, Bill McDermott had asked me what I thought of the new-gen of executives.  In background, I had heard from many customers as I was writing SAP Nation 3.0 that their legacy ECC (and PeopleSoft and Baan) systems were increasingly a recruiting liability as they tried to hire younger tech talent. So, SAP's changes were in line with what many customers were experiencing. 

However, there are more executive changes since at SAP. So people ask did McDermott need to leave along with Rob Enslin and others this year? Who exactly are Jennifer and Christian? What's wrong at SAP?

Let me try and address them. I have not talked to Bill since Thursday but his decision to leave after 10 years as CEO is really not that dramatic. According to Korn Ferry, the average Fortune 500 CEO tenure is less than 5 years.

People speculate he wilted under pressure of activist investors. Frankly, as I wrote in the book, the last 3 years have been quantum more demanding.

"That (McDermott HBR) interview was conducted before President Trump came to office. I imagine there are now additional challenges in being an American CEO of a European company."

About Jennifer, Fortune included her in its list of the 50 most powerful women in the world. They described her meteoric rise at SAP "going from head of regulated businesses (till January 2013) to overseeing all of the Americas, Japan, and Asia Pacific in just five years.”

In my book, I cataloged the Digital Transformation that Christian has led within SAP. This extract should give you some dimensions of the complexity

"We are tackling the whole value chain at SAP. We are looking end to end, looking at marketing, sales, finance, service and support, cloud operations and the cloud infra- structure. That’s the first aspect of our transformation. Next, we are infusing machine learning, IoT, predictive analytics and these new technologies to bring the intelligence into play. It’s about adapting business processes to the new digital age. It’s about fixing the data architecture. Last but not least, it’s about change management, and taking the people with you. In the end, everything that we do in the cloud impacts our 90,000 employees and our 400,000 customers.”

They are both impressive executives. The Co-CEO arrangement is unusual, but not at SAP. McDermott was co-CEO with Jim Hagemann Snabe for several years. They replaced Léo Apotheker, who himself was once an co-CEO.

Honestly, I think the industry needs a jolt. While the book overall is positive to SAP, it highlighted the under-achiever performance of the industry in the last two decades. I mean that to include SAP and Oracle and Salesforce and Workday and Infor and IBM and HP and many others.

Amazon shows authors "popular highlights" that a cluster of readers mark on their Kindles. Chapter 2 of the book looked at the disappointing performance of enterprise vendors. The majority of the highlights so far for my book are in this chapter - see some extracts below, courtesy of Amazon's algorithms

Page 32

In the meantime, SAP and its competitors, who mostly focused on each other while trying to one- up each other and impress Wall Street, have missed out on large opportunities emerging around them. (the chapter discussed cloud infrastructure, smart products, digital advertising, IoT and many other markets that new entrants like Amazon, Google, Foxconn, Siemens and others took advantage of)

Page 40

In October 2018, Oracle co- CEO Hurd predicted that 80% of business applications would be in the cloud by 2025. Today, even after two decades of cloud computing, industry and geographic coverage is spotty — by my estimate, less than 20%.

Page 45

More alarmingly, we are starting to see customers get tired of waiting for vendors and go back to building their own replacement systems. With microservices, open source and other options, we are seeing the pendulum swing away from buy back to build. That’s a stunning reversal from the 1990s.

Page 53

However, they don’t have enough process visionaries who can dream up next- gen shop floors, emergency rooms or warehouses. So you see the industry continue to invest in infrastructure, platforms and tools.

 

If Jennifer and Christian only focus on financial performance, they will do little to change the industry trajectory. We desperately need them to aim differently. Much as I respect what McDermott did, I am looking forward to the next era at SAP with that hope.

SAP Nation 4.0?

I sent Bill McDermott a “please stay in touch” note last night, and sure enough a couple of hours later, even on what must have been an emotional day for him, I got a nice note back. I have always admired his polite grooming and his always-positive vibe.

 

As an analyst, though I have to unemotionally look at technology vendors from a customer pov and my trilogy of SAP Nation books provide a nice summary of McDermott’s legacy at SAP.

On Wednesday, before I knew of his decision to resign, I had the opportunity to summarize that at an ASUG Executive Exchange event. On a panel with CEO Geoff Scott I laid out what I have liked about SAP in the last few years

A) It has been a product launch machine, and I encouraged the audience to not just look at S/4HANA, but also C/4, Leonardo ML and IoT, Qualtrics, IBP, AIN, SCP and other newer products.
B) I told them I liked what Bill and Hasso have done to make “younger” the SAP leadership with Christian, Jennifer, Juergen, Alex, Ryan, Jared and many others.  I suggested the audience similarly think about their recruiting profiles to attract younger tech talent and make that a consideration and not wait till 2025 to consider migrating from the ABAP world
C) I told them Bill, in particular, had made SAP a lot more open and humble. I certainly saw that in writing volume 3.0

I also told them what I would like to see SAP deliver and what will now become Jennifer and Christian’s legacy

A) I want to see SAP become much more serious about the public cloud. I have told Christian I worry that in a few years we will have 000s of single tenant S/4 installations. That will only replicate the implement, upgrade, AMS economics of the previous generation that led to my writing volume 1 which was not flattering to SAP. It will also prevent SAP from gathering substantive data in the cloud for effective cross-customer ML scenarios. SAP has always been better at developing code more than supporting it, so it will take a sea change for SAP to build and importantly scale its public cloud at demanding SLAs. It does have pockets of multi-tenancy experience with BYD and its cloud properties but needs to expand that. 
B) SAP’s “digital core” is already the widest in the industry compared to that of its competitors. However, even that is tiny compared to the industry footprint of the customers it serves. SAP needs to deliver vertical functionality - every industry has gone through seismic changes in the last 15-20 years - and it needs to step up not keep looking for partners to help deliver industry specific operational functionality that its customers have been paying it maintenance for all these years.
C) SAP has to significantly prioritize its customers above its partners. It has to push its SI and outsourcing partners to automate their operations or even cannibalize them with its own IP. Additionally, the market pendulum is swinging back to build technology from the last few decades of buying. SAP needs to view its hyperscale partners - Amazon, Microsoft, Google among them - not just as infrastructure but as platform plays. They have to be viewed as co-optetion, not just as partners and it needs to make its own cloud platform and other build capabilities much more vibrant. 

On the ASUG panel, I was asked when I would write SAP Nation 4.0. Not anytime soon I said. McDermott’s move has me rethinking, but I really want to give Jennifer and Christian time to make their mark. 

 

I look forward to their success, and in the meantime I promise to be tough but fair in my blogs and importantly, in the advice I provide to customers. 

 

Exciting times ahead. 

Oracle: Gen 2 cloud, but Gen 1 applications

Larry presented on Fusion applications in his second Oracle OpenWorld keynote yesterday. It is a bit unusual for him to dedicate a full keynote to applications. He tends to focus on database and infrastructure topics, and mostly tweak application competitors where it suits him. In a nice touch, he did take time to talk about co-CEO Mark Hurd who is out on medical leave.

I have followed Oracle for three decades and even when talking applications, Larry emphasizes what at Gartner we called "speeds and feeds". So, buy Oracle apps "because we use native stored procedures, we have a thin client architecture" etc. The reality has always been that customers buy applications based on functionality and economics as much as architecture and tools. However, he continues to mostly emphasize the technology not what the business user needs.  Yesterday it was about using the autonomous database, multi-tenancy in the cloud and machine learning.

History has shown wave after wave of Oracle applications do fine, but never get to dominant market share, and Oracle ends up catching up with acquisitions. That's partly because they don't benchmark their features and functions against world class customer needs. Could their manufacturing software run the BMW plant in Greer, SC with its massive amounts of automation - robotics and sensors? Could their warehousing functionality run an Amazon fulfillment center which utilizes concepts such as "chaotic storage"?  Can their supply chain run last-mile and same-day delivery concepts being tried out in retail, grocery and other distribution markets? Can their applications run a world class 'operating room of the future" for a healthcare company? Could a MNC customer looking for a global 2 tier ERP strategy count on NetSuite to support it in Indonesia, Brazil and Poland?

What was striking yesterday was how narrowly Larry defined enterprise applications. He said cloud infrastructure competitors (Amazon, Microsoft, Google etc) don't have such applications, ignoring that the pendulum in the industry is swinging from buy to build and tons of enterprise application code is being written on their infrastructure and platforms. He ignored that massive amounts of VC and customer investment has gone into vertical functionality like in FinTech - just visit Shanghai or London and see the vibrant startups there - and that for healthcare and other industries.  

He claimed Oracle has "more applications, more features, more functions" than any other suite - ignoring all the vertical functionality SAP has. He said Oracle is replacing SAP at customers - but none of his examples showed SAP customers moving industry functionality like utility billing or oil and gas functionality to Oracle. He took shots at S/4HANA as "hosted, not in the cloud" ignoring that many of his own customers are still not convinced about the public cloud. In fact his own announcements this week with VMware and "Oracle Cloud at Customer" reflect that reality. Or that SAP's contemporary portfolio today vastly exceeds his - it includes S/4, C/4, all its cloud acquisitions, AIN, IBP, ByD, Qualtrics and much more.

To his credit, he acknowledged that Fusion applications have taken "12 or 13 years" to bring to market. Actually, it has been longer than that because in January 2006, Oracle was already announcing it was "Halfway to Fusion". But let's not nitpick. The reality is in those 12, 14, 16 years Oracle has and in fairness its peers have completely missed out on developing applications for several trillion $ markets. Those included smart products, digital marketing, IoT, various verticals - - download the chapter from my recent book in link here if you want to read about all the missed markets. Google, Facebook, Foxconn, GE, Siemens and a whole bunch of vertical players have thrived in those markets even as Oracle and other applications vendors ignored them.

The good news is those markets are not closed. They are looking for their own Gen 2 applications.

That's Oracle huge opportunity - Gen 2 applications on its Gen 2 cloud. But it needs to get serious about developing or acquiring those Gen 2 applications, not just peddle its long-delayed Gen 1 applications.  

Oracle OpenWorld from afar

I have been watching bits and pieces of OOW from afar. Some observations

Larry, can I please have some of the anti-aging stuff you are on? Damn you look good

Marc Benioff and Aneel Bhusri, I know you are good friends but I want to know which of you, and after how many glasses of wine, thought up this brilliant placement at Oracle Park

The Oracle autonomous database does work. No DBAs on Howard Street during OOW week! Replaced by autonomous cars

Vishal Sikka, curious minds want to know whether you were thinking of your escape from SAP or Infosys here

Jeff Bezos should talk to Marc and Aneel - buy some space at Oracle Park and Larry may just leave him alone

Safra, my wife similarly wants to know your anti-aging secret.

Three pivots on one slide! I watched the whole Accenture pitch and ended up with a whole new buzzword dictionary.  

Oracle freemium......I cannot want to see the anti-aging stuff for this

Good to see Moscone center infrastructure has dramatically improved. NOT, but at least people are good humored about it. Or at least the female of the species.

More anti-aging - Steve Miranda's baby face never ages. He need not have had 2015 call in.

And the Oracle Twins - they age together and ever so gracefully

You know, I may never physically go to an OOW again. I would be wasting time with silly bloggers and missing out on all these astute observations!

BTW, I also have some drone generated pics. As they say, I could show you, but then I would have to .....:)  

Photo Credit - Oracle session replays and the #OOW19 Tweet stream.  

Re: Oracle OpenWorld

I am going to miss going to the event next week. My fault. I had a conflict that cleared up, but not in time for Oracle to register me. I have asked them for streaming info so will catch up on a few sessions that way. Sorry to miss those who are going.

In the meantime, thanks to many of you for your input on whether I should think of next writing Oracle Nation. I have also reached out to Oracle to measure what their level of support might be if I do end up writing. Hopefully, it is comparable to the support I got from SAP in writing SAP Nation 3.0. I expect to hear back in a couple of weeks.

Those who do go to OOW, please send me your thoughts on the book, especially on the applications side of the business. You can be my eyes and ears there - will help considerably in my decision. Thanks!!

Time for Oracle Nation?

I have analyzed Oracle applications business since the early 90s - first at PwC, then Gartner, now at Deal Architect. I have long been a Larry Ellison admirer, much less so of his company's applications. It has been a perennial, promising, second ranked "Avis" in the applications market. The problem is their "we try harder" mission often gets distracted by the company's database or tools or infrastructure business. I get excited every few years, but they always seem to lose momentum. Reading Steve Miranda's comments in Seeking Alpha, it may be time to get excited again:

"It is the industry's most complete set of cloud applications and consists of more than 1,100 different modules. We have applications for every business function from finance and HR to supply chain, manufacturing, sales, marketing, and customer service. Our portfolio also includes dedicated applications for industry verticals."

If the 1,100 modules cover a wide range of global and vertical angles, it  would make them by far the vendor with the widest functionality in the cloud. See my post about the poor Glo-ver coverage in enterprise apps. 

I have thought about writing Oracle Nation in the past focusing on its application business history over the last couple of decades. It is a rich motherlode to mine: 

- Lots of very interesting executives - Larry, Mark Hurd, Ray Lane, Charles Phillips, Thomas Kurian among the many who have shaped its applications journey

- A wide tapestry of application software companies which have been acquired by Oracle

- Changing mix of competition - Microsoft, SAP, Salesforce, Workday etc.

- Legal and other spats with DOJ, SAP, Rimini Street etc

I have hesitated in the past because of several reasons

- Many a gossipy book has been written about Larry, so I understand why Oracle is a bit wary of authors. That is not my angle - I write about companies not personalities. I have plenty of contacts at Oracle customers, partners, alum but but without open access at Oracle, the book would be incomplete.

- My style is case study heavy. I like to interview a broad range of customers across countries and industries. I have not seen that range of customers - sure Oracle has them, but will need help there.

- As a couple of my analyst friends have (snarkily) asked - what new will you present in the book? Their point is Oracle is the bully in the industry, not well-liked - how will I be able to change that perception? 

Frankly, my job is to present the facts based on lots of research and let the reader decide on the perception. As another analyst once told me "You can make a brown paper bag sound interesting". 7 books in the last decade have given me plenty of practice.

Two decisions I have to make in the next few months:

- The first is a business decision. Based on feedback to my recent book, SAP Nation 3.0, I sense a book on Salesforce/Workday and other SaaS leaders may generate more of an audience. Even more would be one on PaaS and IaaS using Amazon, Microsoft and Google tools. 

- Secondly, I have to make sure this is not another case of "mission accomplished". In 2006, Oracle had (way) prematurely celebrated "Halfway to Fusion". I need to ensure the 1,100 modules in the cloud, as Steve claims, cover a wide range of global and vertical angles and have a reasonable number of customers in production. 

Likely make a decision before the end of the year. Readers - help me out with your thumbs up or down and why.  

Infor: Part of the bigger Koch puzzle

I was excited when Charles Phillips and his team arrived at Infor in 2010. I looked forward to them executing to their vision they would focus on various verticals like healthcare and hospitality. Over the last few years I have become less excited as they have not delivered operational functionality for those verticals, but more horizontal financials, crm, and hcm functionality.  

I am not just picking on Infor. I have been clamoring for more "Glo-ver" functionality. After 20 years of cloud apps, we have too much of the horizontal stuff in English-speaking countries. Customers are not waiting and they are finding plenty of solutions to fill geographic and vertical niches. They are going to startups, SIs and are even filling the gaps themselves.

Which is why it is interesting to see (courtesy of Bloomberg, sub required) the other tech investments Koch Brothers have been making in addition to that in Infor.

Then you look at the breadth of the Koch empire across industries

Sure they are going through a variety of digital transformations in these subsidiaries and could commercialize that in the form of solutions to bring to market.

So, the opportunity for more "Glo-ver" is at the Koch level. I hope they start presenting to us at that higher level of vision. That would get me and many customers a lot more excited.