I did a couple of (un-enjoyable) years to start my career at Price Waterhouse. I audited accounting processes at several companies and government agencies. 3 decades later I am still surprised how inconsistently many of those processes have evolved.
Accounts Payable
In 1990, Michael Hammer wrote his seminal article “Don’t automate, obliterate” where he described how Mazda needed only 5 AP employees while Ford needed 400. He described what is called “Evaluated Receipts Settlement” – pay upon receipt of goods, tackle inaccuracies later in cycle. Today with scanning and matching technology, it is surprising how paper intensive the process still is. Instead of using Big Data based forensics most companies still have petty AP policies. So what if the IRS says no receipts needed under $ 75, our suppliers better document every single dime they charge us. BTW talking about receipts, the travel world has become almost completely digitized (see my note on a recent cashless trip to NYC which in past required raiding the ATM machine) but the T&E process at many companies is still awfully paper intensive/
Budgeting
One of my first research notes at Gartner in 1995 was titled “Budgeting: The painful ritual”. 20 years later most companies still use spreadsheets and make basic adjustments to previous actual and estimates. It is still a hugely political process to agree on budgets. Even the large forecast misses during the last recession have not done much to shake this ritual. Even the ability to develop econometric models using newer analytics has not reshaped the process much.
Assets
On the flip side, I have been impressed to see many asset intensive industries use sensors and tags to allow for better predictive maintenance and asset tracking. Of course for many, it is still about glorified depreciation accounting.
Billing and Receivables
While billing has become more complex with an explosion on SKUs, assortments, configurations, and as tax calculations and shipping options proliferate, you can see the warts as they struggle to adjust to subscription revenues, tax holidays, currency conversations and other adjustments. With many government agencies and utilities it is painful to see how poorly their receivables are handled as they struggle to accept recurring credit card charges, as they accept disputes etc
A growing number of companies are looking at cloud based financial options. This is healthy, especially if they can get away from the economic burden of their legacy ERP provided accounting, but that automation needs to be supplemented with the obliteration part. Ironically, their auditors are often the barrier – they worry about cloud based security, controls, SLAs – without benchmarking against the status quo which is pretty bad.
And talking about auditors it is surprising how little sampling and forensics have evolved in that profession since I was a young pup. I am just glad I did not have to continue auditing accounting processes beyond the initial required couple of years I had to endure.
The Back Office is crowding out the Front Office
McKinsey has some examples of what it calls digital optimization of the back office
Problem is in most enterprises the “back office” is much more basic back office – it is made up inefficient data centers, overpriced ERP and related outsourcing, onerous IT, procurement, hr and accounting processes. And yet in the name of compliance and controls, enterprises cannot let go.
I spoke recently to an oil company executive who was describing the huge potential of sensors and other technology in the field, but the funding will need to come from beating down their on premise ERP spend which the accountants are likely to fight. In the session with CIOs last week when I presented at UC Irvine, similar scenarios came up. Back office IT is crowding out front office IT in many environments
But try telling that to consultants affiliated with accounting firms, analysts with legacy IT roots, vendors with vested interests who continue to assure customers their back office is best in class. Even though it is nowhere as elaborate as what McKinsey calls back office.
May 23, 2014 in Industry Commentary | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)