This continues a series of columns from practitioners I respect. The category "Real Deal" describes them well. This time it is Jim Fowler, director of competitive market intelligence for Software AG, based in Reston, VA.
When Vinnie invited me to write a guest post on the topic of competitive intelligence (CI), I was faced with a dilemma: how do I shed light on my profession without divulging information that could put my employer at a disadvantage? My solution is to cover a few essential principles of CI that might be helpful to someone just entering the field, or to a vendor that has decided it’s finally time to stand up a CI function within the company.
Competitive intelligence is not corporate espionage. When people learn that my job is CI (and that I am located about 15 miles from CIA headquarters in Langley, VA), some immediately envision me as a cloak-and-dagger spook, tapping phones by day and dumpster diving by night. In fact, CI is a recognized profession, with a formal society called Strategic and Competitive Intelligence Professionals (SCIP) dedicated to working within applicable laws and well-established ethical guidelines. For example, when I attend an industry event, I am not allowed to use a fake ID, pocket my badge or use any other means of deception to elicit information. And I insist that any vendors I hire to help me abide by the same guidelines. This makes the task of data gathering much more difficult, but it also helps keep my profession within the realm of legitimacy and respectability.
Context is king. The basic principles of competitive intelligence are fairly straightforward, and intensive courses are available from groups such as Academy of Competitive Intelligence to teach them. However, the craft of CI takes decades to master. And it is not only about sophisticated data gathering and analysis techniques. The practitioner must have significant industry knowledge in order to know which information is relevant, and which patterns are truly meaningful. I suppose there are many CI professionals with masters’ degrees still job hunting in part because they lack vertical industry knowledge.
Intelligence is not action. One of the biggest temptations in CI is to collect and analyze a bunch of interesting data without having a clear purpose in mind. To avoid this problem, I and many others in the CI field use a method called Key Intelligence Topic (KIT). With this approach, every research project starts with a question or topic that needs to be answered. But more importantly, the project cannot proceed until two critical questions are answered: 1) What decision will be made or action taken based on this information? 2) Which individual owns the action or decision? The individual identified must typically sign-off on the KIT project before it starts. The KIT approach is a very effective filter, and it is interesting how many potential-time-waster CI projects never materialize once this filter is applied.
Secondary research is nice; primary research is essential. With so many free online tools available such as Google, LinkedIN, Facebook, etc., it might be easy to imagine doing data collection with nothing more than a notebook or tablet and a cup of coffee. This is called secondary research. But in fact the most valuable data comes from primary research – having a phone conversation or face-to-face meeting with a specific individual. Primary data collection is the true “black art” of CI, and all the best online research tools in the world are no substitute. If you don’t personally have this skill, you need to work alongside someone who does.
I personally find competitive intelligence a very rewarding and interesting job. However, to my potential competitors thinking of establishing a CI function, I would say that it is a complete waste of time, and they should invest their resources elsewhere :)
***********
Jim can be reached at jim DOT fowler AT softwareag DOT com
Meg Whitman and Ginni Rometty in 2016
We are at a historic point in the industry's evolution. Two strong and accomplished ladies are leading our biggest and most iconic tech companies, HP and IBM. As I read and heard about Meg Whitman at Gartner’s event in Orlando and about Ginni Rometty at an IBM event for CMOs in Paris last week, I pondered where they and their companies will be in 4 years.
Ginni, it appears, is on cruise control on a well paved highway and can afford to be chasing after new buying centers and making stylistic changes at IBM as Fortune describes below. HP is, in contrast, on a rocky road. Meg said last week 2013 will be a “fix and rebuild’ year. But so was 2012 and 2011.
Fortune:
But appearances are deceptive.
What Fortune, and for that matter most of the media which follows IBM, do not point out is Ginni’s substantial challenge is not just to change the top soil, but redefine the aging core her predecessors have left her with. IBM Marketing does a good job presenting its Smarter Planet, Watson, digital marketing initiatives. But put together they make up less than 20% of IBM revenues.
The “core” is made up of 10, 20, 3o year old assets IBM continues to milk. An SAP practice which grew substantially with the PriceWaterhouseCoopers acquisition in 2002. The mainframe DB2 database which was first released in 1983. Lotus Notes first released in 1989 and acquired by IBM in 1995, Data Centers designed in the 80s and 90s with Cold War bunker mindsets.
Customers continue to utilize these products, but few of them are pleased when they see the IBM invoices for them. IBM still expects premium prices for these products, way past their prime. Ginni’s biggest challenge will be to get IBM customers to say “Neat” again.
Meg, in contrast, has an undisciplined portfolio of products that has been difficult to prune. However, she still has plenty of engineering talent important in a Polymath world where Apple, Google, Microsoft and Oracle are showcasing innovation via blended hardware/software and cloud capabilities. She also is well positioned as consumerization continues to influence the enterprise. IBM has, in contrast, by spinning off its PC and printer divisions has been shrinking that engineering and consumer footprint over the last decade.
Also, what is considered Meg’s big weakness – its EDS heritage services and Ginni’s biggest strength – Global Services – may soon be flipped around. Meg realizes IT is still her major buying center. At Orlando, as an example she said “marketing chiefs matter, but HP will also work through the CIO." IBM in contrast, is using its IT centric services to sell to the CMO – a bit of a stretch unless its acquires some digital agencies and social analytics tools.
Both HP’s and IBM’s services group are challenged in 3 market segments – infrastructure outsourcing, application management and BPO. The first and fast movers with rapid growth over the last five years have been cloud companies like Amazon, Rackspace, SaaS vendors like Salesforce and Workday (that are cannibalizing upgrade and application management services) and firms like Cognizant and Appirio. Granted they are growing from smaller bases, but they are growing explosively. Then there is another early trend – companies which outsourced to legacy service providers are bringing the support back in or are increasingly “churning” it. GM’s recent decision to bring 3,000 jobs in from HP may be a harbinger. Meg’s smaller footprint in the legacy service provider space may actually turn out to be a blessing.
Both Meg and Ginni have unique opportunities and challenges ahead. I would love to do a book in 2016 cataloging how both of them have fared. No, nothing to do with the next Presidential race – but will be a good checkpoint for their performance in their new jobs and also fit well with my every 2 years book schedule.
October 28, 2012 in Enterprise Software (IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, SAP), Industry Commentary, Outsourcing (IBM, Accenture, EDS) | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)