I ran into Stan Swete of Workday last week and he mentioned they had been carefully benchmarking upgrade costs vis-a-vis on-premise vendors. In turn, his ears perked up when I told him about NetSuite’s recent benchmark of energy efficiency in their cloud compared to on-premise.
While most SaaS/cloud vendors look ridiculously cheap in most TCO elements compared to their on-premise competitors, in the next wave (sooner than you think), they will be compared against each other.
So, last week in our conversation with Parker Harris of salesforce, the question came up – why would customers pay its storage costs compared to rates amazon and now Microsoft with Azure are bringing to market? Will it need to rethink its EMC infrastructure? From there the conversation moved to whether it needed the Oracle DBMS – whether it could afford to keep passing along those costs when vendors like Zoho and RightNow aggressively use open source components.
Cloud vendors have to take control of every aspect of their TCO. Like Google with its commoditized server chips. Like NetSuite imploring its reseller channel to deliver more services as software. Like Microsoft rethinking data center design and economics. Like salesforce going to market with smaller SIs like appirio, Model Metrics and others – not just the traditional SIs. Network costs. Systems management costs. Every aspect of the TCO.
Yes, that includes sales costs. As they grow, I am seeing some cloud vendors go back to the “big boys” for sales talent. Not sure that is smart. Because that continues to assume your competitors will continue to be Oracle and IBM. In the meantime, their future competition - other cloud vendors are scheming how to drastically lower their SG&A.
Update: plenty of other examples from readers. Helpstream leverages MySQL and the amazon cloud. Nenshad mentions PaaS below - Coda has leveraged salesforce.com's platform for speed and cost efficiency.
Yearning to get on the AT&T mobile network
So am I going soft? Me, one of AT&T’s regular critics for its outrageous international roaming, for its patchy 3G, then exaggerating its 3G reach in its ads…but at many times on the 4.5 hour Southwest flight yesterday where I signed onto its Row 44 “wi-fly”, I could not wait to get on the ground and onto the AT&T network.
Only 4 of us on the flight were on the service (I walked about the plane and asked anyone who had a laptop open). So, not enough to cause contention issues. Each was unhappy with the service.
It started off surprisingly well. I ran a ping on Speedtest.net and the download speed was 1.8 mbps. Not bad. Yahoo Maps give you an interactive location, altitude etc. Cool.
The upload speed, though, was snail like - less than 200k. And it went downhill from there. Pages were taking minutes to load. Firefox froze a couple of times. Oh well, write off the $ 10 fee.
But I decided to switch to my PDA and paid another $ 6 (yes, lower fee than for laptops). Much better. I could check all my mail accounts – multiple ISPs. I could use Twobile to post tweets - about 70% of attempts. I could track the Rays -Yankees on the ESPN site. But (not surprisingly) the YouTube client would not connect to its servers. Same with AT&T’s Cellular Video.
Though Southwest specifically says VoIP is a no-no , I tried to fire up Skype. The app would not load. Google Voice: called my daughter – she could hear me. I could not. So we switched to its SMS back and forth.
I had a Twitter conversation with Karen Auby of Plantronics during the flight. Her experience on Virgin’s wi-fly is a lot more pleasant.
Overall, though the words “poor man’s Jetblue” kept popping in my head. I mean for most of the decade satellites have allowed its passengers to watch live TV – and here I was squinting into a PDA and finding out every few minutes whether Jabba Chamberlain had thrown a ball or a strike.
Wi-fly better get good in a hurry.
So, back on terra firma, I fire up Bing Mobile on my PDA to help me navigate, and I get on a call. Few minutes into the call I notice the maps are not painting. I have moved out of AT&T’s 3G coverage and of course when you are downgraded to its Edge coverage you cannot walk and chew gum at same time.
Oh, because I am in the wilderness where I should be grateful for any coverage? Yes, the wilderness called I-880 which cuts through the heart of Silicon Valley. And all the negative feelings towards AT&T came rushing back…
July 30, 2009 in Industry Commentary | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)