Signed up for a Verizon upgrade for home line last week. Much faster speeds than previous DSL as SpeedNet confirms. At a lower cost. Cannot beat that.
But what’s the middling ISP rating of 3.4 for?
Probably because many folks are going through this experience
a) The outside line drop was supposed to take place last Saturday. Wednesday, the Verizon truck arrives. Thought the job was done while we were away Saturday. “Oh, may be they wired the wrong house”. (wow!). Are we allowed to water the lawn you are uprooting? “Just call us back and we will replace whatever does not grow back” (more wow!)
b) Inside job scheduled for yesterday between 10-12. Wednesday night get a confirmation call. Nice. 10.15 am get a call “You tech is running late. Should be there in 15 minutes” Thanks for the update. So far so good.
1215 I call back. “That time was just an estimate. Your tech is having issues at his previous install”. At 1 another tech shows up. Takes him a good 5 hours but we have FiOS service.
c) at 7 pm, after tech is long gone, we discover one of the restrooms near where he worked has no electricity. Try the circuit breaker routine. Dead.
d) 8 pm Call Verizon help. Usual help desk routine – want more info from you then they provide. Sends me an email “You recently contacted the Verizon Fiber Solution Center regarding your voice service over FiOS. My objective was to provide you with outstanding service. As promised, I am providing links to the Verizon website that will assist you with managing your voice service in the future. “ It is signed “FiOS Solution Center Team” and has the ominous “This message was sent from a notification only email address that cannot accept incoming email messages.”
What does this have to do with the electricity problem? He ends my call with “Dispatch will contact you within 24 hours”. No I yell at him - just get that very tech back for 10 minutes and he may know exactly what he tripped or cut. But the rep was too busy gathering even more info about our household.
e) 10 pm – Check Ticket status on line. Error message “Module MSA Trouble Ticket is temporarily unavailable.”
f) 7 am today – same error message. Time to call dispatch and go through another likely runaround.
After thousands of these installs, I am surprised at the sloppiness of the process. 3.4 out of 5 ISP rating is generous at least for the install process.
From “Feel Good” to “Good Feel”
I was reading Bruce Rogow’s nicely done summary of his series of CIO “Odyssey” interviews at Cognizanti (subscription required). Bruce, my former Gartner colleague, is one of the more strategic IT thinkers in the industry
One section specific to collaboration jumped out at me:
“The emphasis has shifted from “feel good” efforts such as the chairman’s blog or an employee Web portal, to an array of collaboration efforts that deliver bottom-line benefit, such as accelerated product development, splashier products, better customer support or more tools for more timely
and accurate decision making.”
I look at the agenda at the Enterprise 2.0 conference coming up next month. The agenda has steadily improved over the years with an increasing number of client success stories. But too many of the sessions are still titled “social”, “community” - touchy feely stuff. And as I written before the moniker itself – Enterprise 2.0 is a feel good, frankly pompous term
I keep hearing excuses about why business cases are so hard to develop around Enterprise 2.o. Cisco is doing fine with its collaboration play – telepresence – because it has solid travel expense reduction as business case, even with its premium product pricing. Zoho is doing fine selling SaaS tools which allow for collaboration, but as a recent discussion I had highlighted : would they be better off changing their tag line from“Work. Online” to “Work at a fraction of cost of today’s Microsoft tools”?
Which is what Bruce is saying. Take the top 4-5 burning platforms most CEOs are focused on – customers, products, expenses. Take the KPIs for projects around each and show how social tools can help on each.
Focus on tangible successes. Then you can call it Social Computing or Enterprise 2.0 or Web 3.0 or whatever.
May 31, 2009 in Industry Commentary | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)