Within the confines of our closed Google Groups forum, the Enterprise Irregulars have vigorous food fights on a whole bunch of topics.
Sometimes these debates spill over - this time the topic is around Oracle and whether it innovates. I am glad this debate has gone public. Customers have paid Oracle over $ 75 billion in the last five years and bloggers and analysts and media should all be exploring the value for money for that spend rather than just dutifully reporting its many acquisitions.
Here is the chronology of EI posts on the topic:
I kicked it off last Friday
Dennis Howlett jumped in Monday with his question whether Oracle was an "innovation free zone"
Josh Greenbaum jumped in Tuesday
Paul Greenberg joined in Wednesday
And on Paul's post Bob Warfield and I are slugging it out in the comments
I can see Bob's point when he says "It's true, they are focused on acquisition, but even that is innovative
in our High Tech industry these days which mostly consists of Not
Invented Here shops."
But I can only agree with that argument to a point - it's a "in the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king" argument which would be more persusaive if we did not have Google, Apple, Cisco, Intel, and several other innovators.
It is obviously subjective, but I reward innovation with mentions on my New Florence blog. In the last 3 years there are over 1,000 posts on wide range of innovation areas from mobility to telepresence. Oracle has been
featured there only 3 times - once on Larry Ellison and his fine taste and how that spurs
innovation (I call him a modern day Medici) in clothing, high performance autos etc; once on Exadata, and once on the BMW Oracle trimaran.
Note that only one of them relates to an Oracle product - and that too a joint development with HP.
I am constantly looking for examples of innovation to showcase on that
blog, but they have to be compelling in terms of customer
payback and wow factor. Sure, I have considered putting features like Oracle's Social CRM on the innovation blog but it just was not that compelling after factoring in the typical Oracle TCO.
I would
love to profile Oracle more on the innovation blog, but there is just not enough coming out of
Redwood Shores. For the $ 75 billion over 5 years customers have paid
I am with Dennis - Oracle has been innovation light, if not innovation free.
So you have 2 EIs - Dennis and me - who think Oracle has under-delivered innovation. 3 - Paul, Josh and Bob - think Oracle is doing fine.
Where do readers stand on this?
Nick Carr: High Prose and Hogwash
"Hogwash" - that is what Steve Ballmer of Microsoft called Nick Carr's "Does IT Matter?".
Most of us in technology reacted that way to a academic who likely had never spun a tape or written a line of code or developed a TCO model for an IT project.
But over the last few years, many of us have come to admire the "word bird". His prose when he describes tech trends, especially those about the impact of technology on society weaves a magical spell - as he does in the Sun Magazine interview.
Indeed, it is tough to remind yourself he is a poet not a practitioner.
February 28, 2009 in People Commentary | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)