Enterprises spend as much with telecom vendors as they do the total of all IT vendors - hardware, software and services. And yet the convergence between tech and telecoms accelerates with Apple and Google driving mobile trends, Microsoft with Unified Communications, Intel with WiMax. And telephone companies getting more into IT infrastructure outsourcing services.
But this interview with the FCC Chairman Kevin Martin gave me pause. Amazing the amount of influence the government has on telecom, compared to hardly regulated IT vendors. Some would argue though with telecoms, it's not regulation, it's protection. Telecom companies know the lobbying, regulatory approval processes cold.
So, if anything I would re-balance the regulation. Get the government out of many telecom areas and open up more competition in many telecom sectors. And give it a bit more of a role in IT. Some IT areas I would like to see some basic level of regulation:
a) Require software vendors to open up maintenance to third party providers. It is cynical that vendors have ecosystems of service partners for implementations, but pretend that annual maintenance is too complex for others to support
b) Require outsourcers to disclose what percent of services are delivered from outside the customer's home country. Most western firms have grown sizable labor pools in India and elsewhere but refuse to disclose to customers how much delivery comes from there, so they can protect their margins
c) Require software vendors to improve quality standards and warranties. Shocking the bugs and security holes that vendors deliver and get away with.
d) Require systems integrators to be truthful when discussing "rapid" implementations - to share details of dimensions of projects and effort and timelines rather than puff statements of efficiency
e) Set more standards for energy efficiency, tech waste disposal - other green standards
Ideally, the IT industry does this on its own without any government interference, but in my 2 decades in the industry I have seen vendors pay lip service to the issues, so a threat of outside review may just help. The key is just enough regulation - because as we see in telecoms, the regulation can go too far and still not necessarily help consumers.
Comments
IT and Telecom: Extremes in regulation
Enterprises spend as much with telecom vendors as they do the total of all IT vendors - hardware, software and services. And yet the convergence between tech and telecoms accelerates with Apple and Google driving mobile trends, Microsoft with Unified Communications, Intel with WiMax. And telephone companies getting more into IT infrastructure outsourcing services.
But this interview with the FCC Chairman Kevin Martin gave me pause. Amazing the amount of influence the government has on telecom, compared to hardly regulated IT vendors. Some would argue though with telecoms, it's not regulation, it's protection. Telecom companies know the lobbying, regulatory approval processes cold.
So, if anything I would re-balance the regulation. Get the government out of many telecom areas and open up more competition in many telecom sectors. And give it a bit more of a role in IT. Some IT areas I would like to see some basic level of regulation:
a) Require software vendors to open up maintenance to third party providers. It is cynical that vendors have ecosystems of service partners for implementations, but pretend that annual maintenance is too complex for others to support
b) Require outsourcers to disclose what percent of services are delivered from outside the customer's home country. Most western firms have grown sizable labor pools in India and elsewhere but refuse to disclose to customers how much delivery comes from there, so they can protect their margins
c) Require software vendors to improve quality standards and warranties. Shocking the bugs and security holes that vendors deliver and get away with.
d) Require systems integrators to be truthful when discussing "rapid" implementations - to share details of dimensions of projects and effort and timelines rather than puff statements of efficiency
e) Set more standards for energy efficiency, tech waste disposal - other green standards
Ideally, the IT industry does this on its own without any government interference, but in my 2 decades in the industry I have seen vendors pay lip service to the issues, so a threat of outside review may just help. The key is just enough regulation - because as we see in telecoms, the regulation can go too far and still not necessarily help consumers.
IT and Telecom: Extremes in regulation
Enterprises spend as much with telecom vendors as they do the total of all IT vendors - hardware, software and services. And yet the convergence between tech and telecoms accelerates with Apple and Google driving mobile trends, Microsoft with Unified Communications, Intel with WiMax. And telephone companies getting more into IT infrastructure outsourcing services.
But this interview with the FCC Chairman Kevin Martin gave me pause. Amazing the amount of influence the government has on telecom, compared to hardly regulated IT vendors. Some would argue though with telecoms, it's not regulation, it's protection. Telecom companies know the lobbying, regulatory approval processes cold.
So, if anything I would re-balance the regulation. Get the government out of many telecom areas and open up more competition in many telecom sectors. And give it a bit more of a role in IT. Some IT areas I would like to see some basic level of regulation:
a) Require software vendors to open up maintenance to third party providers. It is cynical that vendors have ecosystems of service partners for implementations, but pretend that annual maintenance is too complex for others to support
b) Require outsourcers to disclose what percent of services are delivered from outside the customer's home country. Most western firms have grown sizable labor pools in India and elsewhere but refuse to disclose to customers how much delivery comes from there, so they can protect their margins
c) Require software vendors to improve quality standards and warranties. Shocking the bugs and security holes that vendors deliver and get away with.
d) Require systems integrators to be truthful when discussing "rapid" implementations - to share details of dimensions of projects and effort and timelines rather than puff statements of efficiency
e) Set more standards for energy efficiency, tech waste disposal - other green standards
Ideally, the IT industry does this on its own without any government interference, but in my 2 decades in the industry I have seen vendors pay lip service to the issues, so a threat of outside review may just help. The key is just enough regulation - because as we see in telecoms, the regulation can go too far and still not necessarily help consumers.
January 09, 2008 in Industry Commentary | Permalink