Joe in another post decomposes IBM's attempt to help justify SOA investment. His comments on the 5 justifications - one uses "a fairly weak example", another has savings "wildly blown out of proportion", the third with "savings only if you were planning to scrap and migrate that legacy system", fourth "some kind of data warehouse/EII effort" and the fifth "E-commerce redux". And Joe is actually an SOA fan.
We may speak a different language from the Brits but they know about the Titanic and SOA=SOS
Joe in another post decomposes IBM's attempt to help justify SOA investment. His comments on the 5 justifications - one uses "a fairly weak example", another has savings "wildly blown out of proportion", the third with "savings only if you were planning to scrap and migrate that legacy system", fourth "some kind of data warehouse/EII effort" and the fifth "E-commerce redux". And Joe is actually an SOA fan.
We may speak a different language from the Brits but they know about the Titanic and SOA=SOS
Boards running scared of SOA
A UK survey of SOA. Courtesy of Joe McKendrick.
Joe in another post decomposes IBM's attempt to help justify SOA investment. His comments on the 5 justifications - one uses "a fairly weak example", another has savings "wildly blown out of proportion", the third with "savings only if you were planning to scrap and migrate that legacy system", fourth "some kind of data warehouse/EII effort" and the fifth "E-commerce redux". And Joe is actually an SOA fan.
We may speak a different language from the Brits but they know about the Titanic and SOA=SOS
April 14, 2006 in Industry Commentary | Permalink