With all the excitement around Sykpe, GoogleNet, Apple's move to integrate the cell phone and the iPod that Om and John write about, it is easy to forget SBC and Verizon. BusinessWeek has a nice article on the two US communication giants. Post-ATT acquisition, SBC is expected to be $ 99 billion. Post-MCI, Verizon is expected to be $ 93 billion. Post respective acquisition, SBC and Verizon will control 80% of the corporate market.
Yes, domestic US long distance rates have been beaten down, but international rates are still wildly inconsistent. Try calling from one European country to another on a US cell phone plan. It is cheaper to fly thereWhen you see what corporations pay for wireless (cells, PDAs, WI-FI roaming etc), data services, videoconferencing and whole bunch more it explains why connectivity is still the single biggest line item in many CIO budgets. For most families, the landline, cell, broadband cable and related equipment plans are a sizable "utility" spend - since the majority still buy connectivity on a fragmented basis.
So, yes new competition is good, and good old fashioned negotiation is still needed just as CIOs and regulators may be starting to feel sorry for the "BabyBells" and other national carriers.
Software Innovation - Optimize Magazine Square-off
Optimize Magazine asked me to provide commentary on whether innovation is lagging in the technology industry, especially software. Here is my column. The opposing viewpoint in the Square Off comes from David Thomas of the Software and Information Industry Association.
My points:
a) we are actually seeing a lot of innovation - Florence during the Renaissance
b) CIOs are, however, in a dark mood as most of their spend is on utility v/s innovation
c) the big software vendors, however, are only spending 15% of revenues on R&D
d) most of their R&D is going in to "tinkering" - as even Steve Ballmer of Microsoft acknowledged recently. Most of the innovation has come from smaller software vendors.
e) CIOs should negotiate hard to get an "innovation dividend" from the vendors and assign that instead to their own innovation "tiger teams" as I have profiled in my category Innovative Business Uses of Technology
Enjoy the cheap seats!
October 31, 2005 in Enterprise Software (IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, SAP), Enterprise Software Negotiations/Best Practices, Industry Commentary, Innovative Business Uses of Technology | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (1)